London Evaluation of 2nd Year

                                                                                                 

Questionnaire  Comenius  Project “Music of art and art of music...” 2014-2015, first year.

Staff Evaluation Results:

           

		Very poor	Poor	Satisfactory	Good	Very good
1.	Project in my own school
	1.1 Involvement of teachers			15%	5%	80%
	1.2 Impact on these teachers			5%	10%	85%
	1.3 Involving students			10%	5%	85%
	1.4 Impact on these students			10%	0%	90%
	1.5 Involving parents			15%	15%	70%
	1.6 Impact on these parents			10%	15%	75%
	1.7 Support by school administration			15%	5%	80%
	1.8 Support by local administration			5%	35%	60%
	1.9 Cooperation with local institutions			2%	18%	80%
	1.10 Communication with community and parents			5%	25%	70%
	1.11 Motivation of staff			3%	2%	95%
	1.12 Amount of Comenius work was appropriate			0%	5%	95%
	1.13 Amount of money for the project was appropriate			10%	0%	90%
2.	Cooperation with partners
	2.1 Communication between partners			4%	18%	78%
	2.2 Use of the language between partners			10%	25%	65%
	2.3 Exchange of materials			15%	15%	70%
	2.4 Respect for the deadlines			12%	3%	85%
	2.5 Relationship among partners			5%	35%	60%
	2.6 Freedom to express opinions			10%	10%	80%
	2.7 Results of the common work			15%	35%	50%
3.a	Meeting in UK
	3a.1 Time for project- work			5%	25%	70%
	3a.2 Time for social- contact			0%	30%	70%
	3a.3 Time for sightseeing			0%	30%	70%
	3a.4 Free time			0%	15%	85%
	3a.5 Duration of the meetings			0%	15%	85%
	3a.6 Timetable			0%	10%	90%
	3a.7 Organization of activities			5%	5%	90%
	3a.8 Information about school- system			0%	5%	95%
	3a.9 Reception and attendance of the participants			10%	10%	80%
	3a.10 Work atmosphere			0%	5%	95%
3.b	Meeting in Spain
	3b.1 Time for project- work					N/A
	3b.2 Time for social- contact					N/A
	3b.3 Time for sightseeing					N/A
	3b.4 Free time					N/A
	3b.5 Duration of the meetings					N/A
	3b.6 Timetable					N/A
	3b.7 Organization of activities					N/A
	3b.8 Information about school- system					N/A
	3b.9 Reception and attendance of the participants					N/A
	3.10 Work atmosphere					N/A
4	Coordinator
	4.1 Communication with partners			4%	36%	60%
	4.2 Support from the coordinator to the partners			10%	35%	55%
	4.3 Respect for the deadlines			15%	15%	70%
	4.4 Instruction for the work			10%	40%	50%
	4.5 Clear distribution of responsibilities			15%	45%	40%
	4.6 Provide management and information given			10%	40%	50%
	4.7 Investment of the coordinator in the project			10%	30%	60%
5.	Final products (second year)
	5.1 Relation between the objectives of the project and the final products			15%	25%	60%
	5.2 Quality of the final products			10%	25%	65%
	5.3 dissemination of products in your country			10%	20%	70%

Parent Evaluation Results:

	Very poor	Poor	Satisfactory	Good	Very good
a)    In what measure you believe that this project: 1.  Has involved the pupils			6%	42%	52%
2.   Contributes to widen the cultural horizon of the pupils			10%	27%	63%
3.   Contributes to increase the awareness to belong to an ampler community: Europe, the World			10%	40%	50%
4.   Promotes creativity			5%	21%	74%
5.   Promotes the learning of the art and music languages			8%	22%	70%
6.   Promotes the learning of English language			N/A	N/A	N/A
7.  Can propose  new knowledge			5%	21%	74%
8.  Can develop positive attitudes			4%	36%	60%
b)    In what measure you believe that the initiatives, thin to you now realize, has been interesting: 1.  Reception foreign delegations: meeting (Only UK and Spain)			15%	15%	80%
2.             Comenius corners			12%	6%	82%
3.             Scholastic festivals			0%	48%	52%
4.             Laboratory of art and music			5%	35%	60%
5.             Laboratory of English language			N/A	N/A	N/A
6.             Didactic use character-mediator,  Little Chameleon			5%	38%	57%
7.             Performances, demonstrations			5%	27%	68%